ننشر نص مرافعة النيابة في قضية مقتل طالبة المنصورة نيرة أشرف| فيديو

Mansoura Criminal Court, headed by Counselor Bahaa Al-Din Al-Marri, heard the prosecution’s argument during the trial of Mohamed Adel, the third year student at the Mansoura College of Arts, accused of killing Naira Ashraf, a student in Mansoura, in front of the university walls, in which it decided to refer the defendant’s papers to the Grand Mufti to take the legal opinion on his execution.

Prosecutor’s plea

Badr Marwan, head of the Public Prosecution Office of the Public Prosecutor’s Office and a member of the statement administration, began the pleading, saying: “In the name of God, the truth, in the name of God justice, in the name of God, the Most Merciful, the Most Merciful. Mr. President, the esteemed body, God has made clear in that noble verse how he equated between killing a single soul and killing all people out of veneration for killing oneself unjustly. An incident that afflicted the hearts of society with anguish, heartbreak and pain.. We bring you today a heart-blowing incident that minds refuse and eyes refuse to believe in. We bring you a painful and cruel incident, its events are tragic. It is horrible and death in it is quick. There are those who witnessed its events with eyes, a statement that filled their ears and eyes. They are the masses of citizens who were coincidentally present in the scene of the incident and its surroundings, and those who survived the harsh realistic coexistence lived its events emotionally on social media. They are the masses of all citizens. The entire Egyptian society, and indeed the whole world, are the witnesses of the incident and the papers are in your hands. We have brought you representatives of the Egyptian society with its impact, and they are more than 100 million citizens. Your justice tells what they experienced of horror, panic and panic, of heartbreak, pain and pain over the separation of the dearest of livers, the killing of a sister, a relative, a student relative, a companion and a friend, a thin university girl, she is Naira Ashraf Abdel Qader, she is all of that and more.

Mr. President, the esteemed body, we have brought to you 100 million Egyptians who are asking for a just retribution. During the past few days, all of Egypt spoke about the circumstances of that crime and its consequences in detail, and we do not need to talk about what is known to all necessarily, but we address the necessary extent of what we must list and explain.

The facts of our lawsuit begin not long ago in front of Mansoura University, in the year 2020 AD, where high school students finished their studies and joined the university and dispersed between the various faculties, and the departments each pursue a goal to achieve, each seeks a goal that he wishes to achieve, among these and these, students chose a college The arts at the university, their stable and the way to achieve their goals, students from the first year start their first academic year with discipline, commitment and seriousness, so they are asked to study research and collect scientific materials, and here we have a young man among them who coordinates the matter for them, and he communicates this with many of his colleagues and colleagues at the university, and interacts with them There is no doubt that collecting research and scientific materials, which is a common link between them, and knowledge of study materials, is a goal that all of them strive for, Who is this that we mention, the accused, Muhammad Adel Muhammad Ismail, who is behind bars, handcuffed in front of you, is a student who works in restaurants and has mastered the use of cooking and dining utensils, this is what his professors trusted in college, and they commissioned him to collect scientific research, and he was famous for that among his colleagues, Among them was the victim, Naira Ashraf, and here the events of the incident at Mansoura University were taking a natural course, scientific research and study matters, and science students who started their university life, and none of them thought that this reality would take an exceptional path, so the situation changed and differed.

He continued in the prosecution’s plea in the case of the murder of a student in Mansoura, Naira Ashraf: We have a pause with the victim, Naira Ashraf Abdel Qader, who is a university student, characterized by aspiration and ambition, self-confidence, self-reliance and a desire for life. They provided her with a space of support and freedom, to achieve her ambitions, so she relied on her condition, and worked with a company in Cairo, in conjunction with her studies, to be able to spend on herself and bear her burdens, without the help of her family, until she started moving between her workplace in Cairo Governorate, her place of residence in Mahalla, and her place of residence. Her studies in the city of Mansoura, and her relations with the nature of her work varied, so she dealt with many without suspicion of harming her, or an act that affects her reputation, contrary to what the current accused claims. Ashraf and its pursuit.

He stated: One day, Naira was present at the college with her friends and colleagues, to follow up on their studies, and the accused was at that time, above his eyes on the victim, and here his conscience moved, towards her, he turned around the victim and was fascinated by her and told himself that she was the girl of his dreams that he wished for, she was not Naira at her time had dealt with him in collecting research, but then the deal happened, so he thought that the fastest way to get close to her and woo her, so he himself began preparing research for her, without asking her, and their relationship was limited to fellowship, and the matter did not go beyond that, Naira dealt with the accused In the usual good faith among colleagues, she remained in good faith with him and within the limits of fellowship, exchanged limited words with him on the occasion of the required study work, but the accused with a selfish and corrupt imagination thought this wrong, he thought that she reciprocated that feeling and admiration, and deluded himself falsely and slandered about this, I think. As soon as we exchanged a conversation with her, it transcends the limits of fellowship, and did not stop at this point, but the accused went too far in thinking of wooing her, and the accused was not in front of her beholder from the ground up, and despite that the accused wanted to help her in the study, to win her love and exchange the same flimsy feeling What happened to him since he met her, and this delusion stems from the corruption of his morals and nature, a strong love of possessiveness, and an unbridled desire to impose his belief on something other than the truth, without discussion, justification, or a mind that accepts that, and it has nothing to do with the matter because of his confusion and lack of balance.

And the representative of the Public Prosecution before the court in the case of Naira Ashraf, explained that the accused continued in this situation for years, and the victim was surprised by his actions, and she wondered what came from me so that you believe that there is a relationship between us? Your time is in a relationship that you imagined alone, and you do not desire another, Mr. President, this was the mouthpiece of Naira, this was her mouthpiece for the actions of the accused who did not stop for three continuous years.

The representative of the Public Prosecution Office said before the court in the case of the murder of Naira Ashraf: Mr. President, there is no description for us that applies to the successive actions of the accused that I have recounted to your hearing, except the lack of manhood, dignity and honor, stubborn pursuit and psychological siege, and blind tracking driven by unbridled passion, without exchanging that with the victim. On her, who was standing in astonishment at what he did, the matter turned against him with a threat and a threat, so fear struck her and became in her path, and the heart is in a leap from a miserable delusion in which he has the right to say the lack of manhood, dignity and honor. Her phone number to communicate with her and satisfy his false desires, so he searched for the number with a group among his colleagues in the college, and here he is making his first contact with her, during which the victim realized that the accused had made a distance and they took a new step towards her, so she turned away from him, and it was only if she banned his calls to deter him And he did not finish or stop, and he followed his selfishness to continue to pursue her and force her to communicate with him against her will, and if he managed the matter for a moment, he would find that this was an announcement from Naira to reject him, but his selfishness overcame his dignity and honor. The representative of the Public Prosecution before the court in the case of the murder of Naira Ashraf, explained that the accused threw his honor to the ground, and gave up his dignity. You will definitely be mine and you will not be anyone else. From text messages, and a lot of conversations, claiming that there is an emotional relationship between them, and a torrent of pursuits that no human being can bear, and no one can keep up with them, sent by the accused blaming her for blocking his communications, forgetting what this ban means, which is an explicit and categorical rejection, of the existence of any relationship between them And he began expressing to her what was in his heart, or getting angry for not answering her. Yes, Mr. President, she did not exchange conversations and correspondences with him, and she did not answer him, and if his answer was to answer him with one word, then that word has enriched him about the length of her silence and symptoms since the beginning of her correspondence, which is another reflection of his lust. The selfishness that possessed him, as the accused was talking to himself by writing to her, and the victim’s tongue, wondering what happened to him, what happened to him and what he wanted from me, let me and my situation between us is nothing but fellowship, and with this it did not stop and did not stop, it was in the orbit of a false relationship.

The victim wanted to raise his status and dignity, and the accused only deluded himself that she meant to neglect and insult him, and here we say to him, by God, he has not insulted or humiliated you but yourself, I only insult you your false ideas, and your corrupt belief.

The Mansoura Criminal Court witnessed strict security measures, before the Mansoura Criminal Court, while securing the second session of the trial of the accused of killing the student, Naira Ashraf, in front of Mansoura University.

Referral of the accused

Today, Wednesday, the Attorney General ordered the referral of the accused, Mohamed Adel, to the Criminal Court; To punish him for what he was accused of of intentionally and premeditated killing of the victim student (Naira), where he made the intention and determined to kill her, and followed her until he got her in front of Mansoura University, and surprised her with a knife that stabbed her several times, and slaughtered her with the intention of taking her soul, and the decision of referral came after Forty-eight hours after the accident, coordination was also made with the competent court of appeal, and the first court session was scheduled for next Sunday, corresponding to the twenty-sixth of June.

Establishment of physical evidence

The Public Prosecution had established evidence before the accused from the testimony of twenty-five witnesses, including students, university security personnel, and shop workers in the vicinity of the incident. During his assault on her, as well as the family of the victim, and her friends, who confirmed the habitual exposure of the accused and his threat to her abuse for her refusal to marry him after he proposed to her, and his attempt more than once to force her to do so, which forced them to write several records against him, and that the accused, days before the incident, sought to communicate with The victim to find out the timing of her boarding the bus she used to ride to the university, and his refusal to answer, all confirming the accused’s determination to kill the victim, and the owner of the bus owner also confirmed his knowledge of its employees tracking the accused victim on the bus that she used to ride to the university, as well as what he testified The chief of investigations is conducting the investigations from the development of the dispute between the victim and the accused due to her refusal to associate with him to his constant exposure to her, until he resolved to kill her, and to choose the time for end-of-examinations. The school year was certain that she would be at the university as a date to commit his crime, and on the day of the incident, he tracked the victim, boarded the bus she used to ride, and killed her upon her arrival at the university.

The Public Prosecution also established evidence before the accused, which was proven by examining her mobile phone, which resulted in it containing several messages she received from the accused, including threats to kill her by beheading, as well as what was proven by watching the recordings of surveillance machines seized by the Public Prosecution at the crime scene extending from the place where the victim was independent, the bus. Even in front of the university, where the independence of the accused in the bus with the victim appeared, and he followed him after her exit from it, and he monitored all the circumstances of her killing when she approached the university, and drew weapons in the face of those who tried to defend her.

Confession of the accused

In its evidence, the Public Prosecution also relied on the accused’s detailed admission of committing the crime during his interrogation in the investigations, and the pictorial simulations he made at the crime scene and showed how it was committed, in addition to the report of the anatomical character of the victim’s body that allowed the incident to occur according to the perception that the investigations concluded and in Contemporary history.

Confronting various forms of violence

On the occasion of this incident, the Public Prosecution confirms its resolute response to all forms of crimes of violence and self-aggression, especially those against women and youth, by cooperating with the concerned authorities, and with the legal competencies that the law empowers them, and its belief in this is the prosecution of criminals, and the speed of bringing them to urgent criminal trial. To achieve complete justice in a country where security prevails with the rule of the constitution and the law.

The Public Prosecution also warns everyone against compromising the evidence and the circumstances of the facts in which investigations are conducted or contacting their parties, whether in that incident or in others, either by addressing them, circulating them, or delving into them with interpretations, interpretations and discussions that are of no benefit behind them except to increase the number of spectators and followers, and to rush to knowledge of the information Without regard to the confidentiality required by the integrity of the investigations, which negatively affects them, disturbs public security and peace, and harms the honor of people and the parties to the case unjustly and without capacity or support, as the Public Prosecution will take strict legal measures against anyone who commits any of these acts which constitute criminal offenses punishable by law, emphasizing its full keenness on the principles of transparency, respect for public opinion and its right to raise awareness in the official and regulated way, and under the umbrella of relative publicity, which is estimated by the Public Prosecution alone with the information it declares in its official statements under its authority and jurisdiction over the public case, and its keenness to Preserving evidence and investigations to achieve their purpose